R. v. B.S. – August 2022

Our client was charged with sexually touching a 10-year-old family friend. At trial the Crown introduced the video tapped statement of the complainant. We cross-examined her on that statement and her evidence at trial and demonstrated inconsistencies and the implausibility of her version of events. We also cross-examined the mother and exposed inconsistencies in her timeline and version of events. We prepared our client to testify and ultimately the judge relied on his evidence and the inconsistencies of the Crown evidence and acquitted our client.